Monday, 19 October 2015

Protecting Your Lenders: Non-Disturbance Agreements 1-2-3

Have you ever worked on a deal where a party has come up on title as having a life interest in a property? This doesn’t happen often but when it does it can stop a deal dead in its tracks prompting us to write a blog on the topic.

Sometimes a non-disturbance agreement can be in place in the case of tenants, which may or may not be registered on title, or a life interest in the property which may be registered on title, which is often the case with family members.

Why do the presence of either squash many deals? Because the existence of same means that the person during the time or under the terms specified cannot be removed from the property even in the case of a foreclosure.

A non-disturbance agreement is an agreement with a tenant and a landlord or homeowner’s lender that the tenant will remain in possession of the property being leased even if foreclosure takes place and in the case of foreclosure may legally begin making payments directly to the lender. At first glance, you may wonder why would any lender would agree to one of these? Often in the case of private mortgages where there is good equity, these agreements take place because they actually give the lender the ability to capitalize on income from the property when a default in the mortgage takes place. Also, in the case of foreclosure, when a buyer is pursuing an income property, with the numbers in line, many don’t mind buying a property that already has a good tenant in it.

On the other hand, the presence of a non-disturbance agreement is bad news for an unsuspecting second mortgage lender, especially one who is unaware that there are tenants in the property. Not only can they see the first lender snatch income from the property until challenged, they can end up with limited recourse in the event of a default.

A life interest on the other hand is actually registered on title and lasts for the lifetime of the person benefiting from that right. We see this often in the case of seniors who continue to live in a home while having transferred it to the name of a beneficiary to streamline probate in the event that they pass away. The life interest ends when the beneficiary dies.

Not every lender wants to be a part of a transaction that involves tenants or someone with a lifetime right to occupy a property. Knowing that a property is a rental property or not owner-occupied is a form of fraud and if uncovered by a lender could lead to the end of your relationship. Life interests will certainly come up if one exists during the closing process once the lawyer begins performing their due diligence. Deals that get this far along in the process and fail to close can leave a lender wondering about your underwriting capability.

It is always important to clearly ask your clients if a property has tenants, if there are any non-disturbance agreements in place. It is also prudent to ask the client how the property was acquired. If it was passed down by a loved one this can be a sign that you may need to do extra due diligence to confirm that a life interest hasn’t been registered.

Being as prepared as possible only helps to streamline the process. Don’t get stuck with unknowns, or assume that those unknowns will remain so - they likely will not. Get as much information as possible and provide it upfront. Visit Purview For Mortgage Brokers today at www.purviewforbrokers.ca.  


No comments:

Post a Comment